![]() ![]() Have you tried combining the two mediums? If so, let me know how it went. On the other hand they will snag more easily on rougher watercolour paper. Mapping nibs provide less dramatic lines, but they also lay down less ink and so the ink will dry faster and spread less.Hot pressed watercolour paper will give you washes with more sharp edges and hard transitions, but will be best for the India ink in terms of smoothness.The rougher the paper the better the watercolour washes will be, and the worse the ink sketches will be.The more cotton content in your paper the better the watercolour washes will be, and the worse the India ink will behave.You must let the ink completely dry or you’ll have a ruined drawing, and potentially a ruined brush (if this happens immediately wash your brush well, as India ink will destroy it if left to dry).There are a few things that you need to remember when combining dip pens and watercolours: Watercolour brings these sketches to life, and makes the ink compromises worth it: it didn’t need to be particularly accurate), I decided to accept some level of feathering and spread for a decent watercolour wash.Ī closeup on the onion sketch shows how much line variation you can get from this kind of nib, just how expressive these nibs are, and some of the feathering and spread that I talked about earlier: As in this case the line sketch wasn’t crucial to me (i.e. The paper isn’t ideal for dip pens (it’s not smooth and the properties that make it watercolour friendly mean that the ink will spread and feather no matter what), but I wanted to use it with watercolours. I decided to use it on a Moleskine Watercolour sketchbook. I took one dip and tested out how much ink it holds. It has a bit of kink to it that helps it hold more ink than it otherwise could hold: To test a nib for its flexing properties you gently push the tines against your thumbnail (don’t ever do this with fountain pen nibs!). I took one out, tested its flexing properties (medium flex), and then primed it as described here. It’s not empty, but rather filled with dozens of Waverley nibs in excellent condition. I bought it for a few pounds at Spitalfields market, London, and would have bought the tin even if it was empty: The tin itself is a delight, with the Waverley Pen advertising doggerel on it (the Pickwick, Own and Waverley were all nibs made by the Macniven & Cameron company). The nibs are Waverley Pen nibs, made in Birmingham (a British steel producing city), and made by Macniven and Camron Ltd. The ink itself is less shiny and flows wetter than other India inks that I’ve tried, but that’s not a bad thing. ![]() The bottle opening is too narrow and tall, and it’s very easy to get ink on your nib holder and hands this way. While the very wide base of this bottle does cut down the possibility of you accidentally tipping it over, I don’t like the bottle design. The bottle shape is unique, and it’s a plastic bottle, not a glass one like my British made inks. This time I decided to combine testing out a new (to me) India ink, a new (vintage) nib and watercolours.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |